Loading tools
Loading tools
Each one is grounded in a named framework and produces a concrete output — a score, a checklist, or a specific next step. Pick a tool to open its own page.
The indicators at the edges represent incoming and outgoing logical relationships to the tools.
Get in touch for bespoke tool development for your organization.
Five-axis questionnaire → 0–100 score, adapted from Gartner's AI Maturity Model.
24-question classifier → EU AI Act risk tier, a 0–100 obligations-readiness score, and a deadline-mapped action plan.
22-question assessor → NIS2 applicability verdict (essential / important / flow-down) and a 0–100 readiness score with a gap audit.
18-question OWASP LLM Top 10 security checklist → 0–100 score across 7 defense categories, per-risk LLM01–LLM10 mitigation matrix, critical execution-sink cap and a prioritized 30-day fix plan.
22-question NIST AI RMF 1.0 self-assessment → 0–100 profile score across Govern, Map, Measure, Manage and the GenAI Overlay (AI 600-1), priority-function alerts under 50% and a prioritized remediation plan.
Evidence-based crypto protocol and token assessment across 5 pillars — Security, Governance, Token Economics, Legal & Regulatory, and Real Use.
Dual-track diagnostic for startup governance, founder fiduciary boundaries, and technical AI safety across 44 research-grounded controls.
Three-track diagnostic for Muslim founders — HalalScore, Funding Structure Navigator and Camel Readiness across 54 research-grounded questions, with a unified executive view and term-sheet audit.
Four-axis questionnaire → 0–100 risk score, adapted from TRL logic.
What investors actually look for. Tick what you have, surface what you don't.
Six questions. An honest score on whether you're the right founder for this problem.
A decision tree for figuring out which kind of technical help you actually need.
Classic make-or-buy framework applied to early-stage tech and vendor decisions.
Is this idea worth your time, and what would prove or kill it? 10-track evidence-based diagnostic with 10-axis radar, pre-registered veto gates, and idea comparison.
20-question screener → DORA posture detection (financial entity / ICT vendor / both) and a 0–100 readiness score with cap overrides, gap audit and a 30-day action plan.
20-question screener → statutory DPIA verdict (required or not) and a 0–100 privacy posture score with fine-exposure tiers, gap audit and a 30-day action plan.
25-question Cyber Resilience Act conformity readiness self-assessment → 0–100 score across 7 categories, product class & conformity route, Article 14 countdown, and a prioritized action plan.
25-question AICPA Trust Services Criteria self-assessment → 0–100 score across 7 categories (CC1–CC9), a Type II evidence-window check, CC gap matrix and a prioritized remediation roadmap.
22-question gap assessment → 0–100 readiness score across the 7 ISMS categories (Clauses 4–10 + Annex A), Stage-1 audit-gate diagnosis, 90-day action plan and NIS2 Art. 21(2) evidence crosswalk.